Meeting Report for 23 January 2012

Written by Jo and Elena (edited by Swarajit)

Introduction

The meeting was opened by Club President Glen who welcomed new and returning guests as well as regular members. He invited the audience to use the Toastmasters educational programme as a guide to better public speaking and leadership.

The Toastmaster of the meeting was Mike–a guest from west London club London Athenians– who was making his debut in the role of Toastmaster. His theme for the evening was days of the week which participants liked or disliked and why, with each speaker limited to two words. Mike was assisted by the Timekeeper Jo, who was performing the role for the second time, and Harkmaster Adam.

Prepared speeches

This evening we were fortunate enough to have an Ice Breaker speech from our new member Ahmed, who made his first step into his Toastmasters career through the Competent Communication programme.  Ahmed’s speech was entitled “Growing up in the Docklands East End” and he gave us a very descriptive overview of his life and how London’s Docklands have changed over the years including the impact these changes have had on his community.

The second speaker was Joe, who presented a No. 6 speech (which focuses on vocal variety) entitled “Ice Cream Sandwich”. Joe explained his trials in getting through to his mobile phone company to upgrade his phone and learn about his upgrade options.  (The title of his speech referred to the latest Android operating system and is, apparently, an upgrade to Gingerbread!)

The third speaker was Femi with his advanced speech from the ‘Speaking to Inform’ manual entitled “The Game of Unspeakable Fun“. The main aim of this speech project is to explain and demonstrate a process. Femi presented a very entertaining speech in which he shared his enthusiasm for the game Taboo and, after he explained the rules,volunteer Neil from the audience took a part in an impromptu game.

The last speaker this evening was Glen with his seven-minute impromptu speech on a topic chosen by the audience– recent cinema release, The Iron Lady. He told us how the film (which Glen himself had not yet seen) presented the Hollywood version of Margaret Thatcher’s life:  she was born to be a superhero, went through difficult times when she was Prime Minister and the biggest challenge she faced – the public vote.

Speech evaluations

After the break we had the evaluations part of the meeting, where speakers,  evaluators and the rest of the audience gain some useful tips and experience of public speaking.

The first evaluator Nazia evaluated Ahmed’s Ice Breaker speech. She commented that Ahmed had used anecdotes, dates and very descriptive language for drawing his personal story and we really got to know him. Only one recommendation for further improvement was a bit more eye contact with the whole audience.

The second evaluator was Neil, who evaluated Glen’s impromptu speech. He commented Glen’s very solid posture and body language, openness and power. He liked Glen’s use of humour and his smiling through out the speech. The main recommendation for Glen was to vary the tone of his voice more.

The third evaluator, Swarajit, evaluated Joe’s No. 7 speech. He commented on Joe’s excellent use of emphasis on certain words, and pauses to express emotions as well as humour. The main recommendation from Swarajit was regarding the structure – to make smooth transitions from the body of the speech to its conclusion.

The fourth evaluator this evening was Hari, who evaluated Femi’s advanced speech. He commented that Femi had definitely met the speech objective – he was very warm, smiled, used props to explain the rules and found a volunteer for the demonstration of the game. This all was very engaging for the audience, though Hari would like to have heard a final recap in the conclusion of the speech.

Table Topics

The Table Topics part of the meeting is not only a great practice for both new and experienced members but also a great fun.

The Topics Master of the evening was Joyanta. He introduced the theme – “Where I would like to live”. Members and guests were invited to explain over 2-3 minutes why they would want to live in Joyanta’s rather unconventional suggestions of places to dwell, including a cave, a rainforest and North Korea!

The Table Topics evaluator this evening was Kate, who evaluated all six participants. She encouraged the participants to use more eye contact around the room and hand gestures.

After Adam’s Harkmaster report, in which he rewarded the most alert listeners with Olympic-themed chocolates, General Evaluator Jane evaluated all the meeting participants who were yet to be evaluated and gave useful recommendations for all.

Awards

Closing the meeting, Glen gave out the awards based on the votes cast during the evening and one President’s discretional award.

The Best Evaluator award went to Hari for his evaluation of Femi’s speech, the Best Table Topics speaker award went to Terry for his fantastic topic, and the highly coveted Best Speaker award went to Femi for his excellent speech. The President’s discretional award went to David for a brilliantly tackled table topic.

The certificate for successfully completing Icebreaker speech – an important landmark for any Toastmaster– went to Ahmed.

Next meeting

Our next meeting is on Monday 13th February.  Also on Monday 12th March we will be holding our speech and evaluation contests.

Please note we have a new venue.

The new venue will be: Real Man Pizza Company, 157-163 Gray’s Inn Road, London, WC1X 8UE.

Meeting Report for 9 January 2012

Written by Elena (edited by Swarajit)

Introduction

This was the first meeting of 2012, with a new venue for the club and a lot of new faces!

The meeting was opened by Club President Glen who welcomed new guests, returning guests, regular members and the club committee. He invited the audience to use the Toastmasters educational programme as a guide to better public speaking and leadership.

The Toastmaster of the first meeting in 2012 was past president, and very experienced member, Nazia. She announced the theme –The goals for 2012– and introduced every speaker to the stage with what they had chosen as their own goal summarised in one word, which was quite a challenge! Nazia was assisted by the Timekeeper Richard, who did this role for the first time.

Prepared speeches

This evening we were very happy to have two Ice Breaker speeches from our new members Maureen and Paula, who made their first step into their Toastmasters careers through the Competent Communication (CC) programme.

This part of the meeting was opened by Paula with her Ice Breaker speech entitled “Going for Gold”. She gave us a very descriptive overview of her life from school age up to the present and also her plans for the near future, including setting up her own website, in the 2012 Olympic year – going for gold.

The second speaker was Maureen, who presented her own Ice Breaker speech entitled “How Risk-Averse Mo Became a Bloomsbury Speaker”. Maureen told us her life story over the last few years explaining how she learnt about Toastmasters through an acquaintance and finally pushed herself to take the plunge and join Bloomsbury Speakers to enjoy the opportunities on offer.

The next speaker was Jo with her speech No.2 from the CC manual entitled “Unexpected Sights in Buenos Aires”. The main objective of this speech project is to organise your speech so that it has an opening, body and conclusion with appropriate transitions between each. Jo told us about several unusual but very popular sights which she had seen during her travels to Argentina including a cemetery, a branch of the famous department store Harrods, the Mothers of Plaza De Mayo and tango dancing.

The fourth speaker was Neil with his No. 4 speech, “Finding a Room in London“. The main purpose of this project is focused on “how to say it” using rhetorical devices. Neil vividly described several highly amusing situations that arose during his search for a room in London, and the characters he met along the way. Happily, it ended with him eventually finding a beautiful place to live earlier in the day.

The last speaker this evening was Swarajit with his No. 5 speech entitled “Evolution of an industry”. The main purpose of this speech project is to make use of body language and physical gestures to convey your message. Swarajit explained how the UK music industry had changed over the last few decades and why he thought this was a bad thing. He argued, using humour, that the rise in popularity of live concerts was unjustified due to the considerable discomfort of attending such events.

Speech evaluations

After the break we had the evaluations part of the meeting, where speakers can get constructive feedback on their speeches and some useful ideas for further improvements.

The first evaluator, Nazia, evaluated Paula’s Ice Breaker speech. She commended a very well structured speech containing three short stories about moving to South Asia, becoming a psychologist and how Paula set up her own business. Nazia also noted Paula’s confident and good strong voice. The only recommendation was to make a more powerful conclusion.

The second evaluator was Joe, who evaluated Maureen’s Ice Breaker speech. He commented that Maureen had excellent vocal variety, used humour that was very engaging with audience, and the structure was good which made it easy to follow the story. Joe made only one minor recommendation: to move on the stage slightly more.

The next evaluator, Adam, evaluated Jo’s No. 2 speech. He commended a very clear message, the great opening and structure of the speech, and an engaging voice and humour. Adam would have liked to have seen a bit more body language from Jo.

The fourth evaluator this evening was Joyanta, who evaluated Neil’s No. 4 speech. He commented that Neil is a very good storyteller, he had fairly successfully joined three small stories into one in the speech and concluded with a memorable quote – “Good luck!” Joyanta encouraged Neil to speak on something like a technical subject in his next speech in order to stretch himself further.

The last evaluator, Elena, evaluated Swarajit’s entertaining No. 5 speech. She recapped the aim of the project and commented that Swarajit had used gestures, facial expressions, eye contact to express his message when delivering his speech, and met that goal. Elena recommended that Swarajit should try to rely less on notes.

Table Topics

During the meeting everyone has a chance to speak and the Table Topics section is one part which ensures this. Participating in Table Topics is great practice for both new and experienced members as well as brave guest volunteers.

The Topics Master of the evening was Hari. He transformed the audience into a group of potential investors and the topics speakers into people looking for investment to realise their goals. The investment seekers were:

  • One of the Wright brothers who have a goal to build an aeroplane.
  • Computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee who needs to convince us to have a world wide web.
  • Creator of a web site where people can reveal all of sorts of details about themselves – a social network.
  • Percy Spencer, looking for investors for an experimental way of cooking food using microwaves.
  • An unemployed IBM scientist whose goal is to start up new business to produce computer.

Five guests took part in the Table Topics including a visiting member from Holborn Speakers.

The Table Topics evaluator this evening was Glen, who evaluated each participant. Common recommendations were: do not be repetitive during the speech, grab the stage and try to use the whole allotted time.

General Evaluator Rosalind, also visiting from Holborn Speakers, evaluated all the meeting participants who were yet to be evaluated and encouraged us to not be afraid to give a few more recommendations because they are gifts for the speakers.

Awards

Closing the meeting, Glen gave out the awards based on the votes cast during the evening and one President’s discretional award.

The Best Evaluator award went to Adam for his evaluation of Jo’s speech, the Best Table Topics speaker award went to guest David for his well-structured topic and the highly coveted Best Speaker award went to Neil for his excellent speech. The President’s discretional award went to a guest Oli for his very impressive Table Topic.

Two certificates for successfully completing their Ice Breaker speeches– an important landmark for any Toastmaster– went to Paula and Maureen.

Next meeting

Our next meeting is on Monday 23rd January at The Real Man Pizza Company.

January 2012 Mini-Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the very first newsletter of 2012!

Hope you had a great Christmas and New Year and are raring to get started again with ramping up your public speaking skills.

I’m going to keep this newsletter short and sweet as it’s only been a couple of weeks since the last one, which appeared a little later in the month than normal.

So, in true Toastmasters style I’m going to give you just three pieces of information.

Here we go…

1) Venue Reminder

You should know this already, but we have a new venue! It’s downstairs at The Real Man Pizza Company. Check out the details here:

https://www.bloomsburyspeakers.org.uk/meetings/

2) Meetings This Month

Our regular meetings this month are on Monday 9th January and Monday 23rd January.

We already have five speakers (including two Icebreakers) booked for each of these meetings – wow! – but there are still a few supporting roles to be filled:

9th January: Topics Evaluator and Speech Evaluator
23rd January: Timekeeper, Topics Evaluator and Speech Evaluators

Please book yourself into ClubPlan or email our VPE Femi at education@bloomsburyspeakers.org.uk to nab your slot.

3) Club Social – Bowling!

There’s still time to book a place on the club social – ten pin bowling at All Star Lanes on Monday 16th January.

Please email Femi at education@bloomsburyspeakers.org.uk by Monday 9th January if you’d like to attend.


Tip of the Month – Evaluate!

Want to be a better speaker? Evaluate someone else’s speech! This will help you to develop analytical skills that you can apply to your own speeches.

However, we know that some people find the idea of evaluating someone else a bit daunting, so we’ve put together a brand new role guide to help you:

What Does An Evaluator Do?

P.S. If you really want to improve quickly – record your speech and try to evaluate it as if you were evaluating someone else. Painful but very useful!


That’s all for now. Told you it would be short and sweet. 🙂 Hope to see you at a meeting soon!

Best wishes,

Glen Long
President

president@bloomsburyspeakers.org.uk